Zesty ranch dip style potato chips, zesty ranch vs Vinegar & salt thin & crispy potato chips, vinegar & salt — Side-by-Side | ProductGuru

This page compares Zesty ranch dip style potato chips, zesty ranch and Vinegar & salt thin & crispy potato chips, vinegar & salt — two products from UTZ Quality Foods, LLC, both in the Chips, Pretzels & Snacks category. The comparison is assembled automatically from public catalog data (specifications, descriptions, brand metadata). We have not held, tested, or independently measured either product; specifications are AI-estimated from the public product descriptions and may not match the current retail SKU. Use this page as a starting point, then verify on the seller's product page before buying.

At a glance

Where they differ

• Ingredients (AI-est.): Zesty ranch dip style potato chips, zesty ranch — Potatoes, vegetable oil (may contain one or more of the following: cottonseed oil, palm oil, corn oil, canola oil, and/or soybean oil), salt, buttermilk, natural flavors, maltodextrin, coconut oil, garlic powder, yeast extract, sour cream (cream, nonfat milk, cultures), dextrose, onion powder, tomat; Vinegar & salt thin & crispy potato chips, vinegar & salt — Potatoes, vegetable oil (may contain one or more of the following: cottonseed oil, palm oil, corn oil, canola oil, and/or soybean oil), salt, lactose, sodium diacetate, malic acid, citric acid, fumaric acid, soybean oil..
• Fat (AI-est.): Zesty ranch dip style potato chips, zesty ranch — 35.7 g/100g; Vinegar & salt thin & crispy potato chips, vinegar & salt — 32.1 g/100g.
• Energy (AI-est.): Zesty ranch dip style potato chips, zesty ranch — 571 kcal/100g; Vinegar & salt thin & crispy potato chips, vinegar & salt — 536 kcal/100g.
• Saturated fat (AI-est.): Zesty ranch dip style potato chips, zesty ranch — 12.5 g/100g; Vinegar & salt thin & crispy potato chips, vinegar & salt — 10.7 g/100g.
• Salt (AI-est.): Zesty ranch dip style potato chips, zesty ranch — 3.2 g/100g; Vinegar & salt thin & crispy potato chips, vinegar & salt — 3.4 g/100g.

Where they're similar

• Country/markets (AI-est.): both list United States.
• Protein (AI-est.): both list 7.1 g/100g.
• Category (AI-est.): both list Snacks.
• Sugars (AI-est.): both list 3.6 g/100g.

Which one for which use case

If Ingredients matters most to you, the two products list different values — see the table above and compare with your own priority. If Fat matters more, the choice may go the other way. We surface the specs; the decision is yours.

We do not rank these products against each other. This is a side-by-side of public data, not a recommendation. For purchase-specific questions (fit, warranty, regional availability, current price), consult the seller's product page or, where the product touches health, safety, or finance, consult the appropriate specialist.

Where to find them

About this comparison

This page was assembled automatically from ProductGuru's public catalog (brand, category, description, EAN/GTIN, AI-estimated attribute tags). We have not held, opened, used, or independently tested either product. Specifications labelled (AI-est.) are extracted by an AI summariser from the manufacturer-supplied product description and may be inaccurate or out of date. Always confirm the current spec sheet with the seller before buying.

Disclaimer: AI-assembled product comparison from public data. Specifications may be inaccurate or outdated. Always verify with the seller before buying. We earn a small commission from eBay if you buy through our links; this does not affect the data or the comparison. ProductGuru indexes public information and does not offer medical, financial, or other professional advice.