Sour cream 'n onion dip style potato chips, sour cream 'n onion vs No salt added thin & crispy potato chips — Side-by-Side | ProductGuru

This page compares Sour cream 'n onion dip style potato chips, sour cream 'n onion and No salt added thin & crispy potato chips — two products from UTZ Quality Foods, LLC, both in the Chips, Pretzels & Snacks category. The comparison is assembled automatically from public catalog data (specifications, descriptions, brand metadata). We have not held, tested, or independently measured either product; specifications are AI-estimated from the public product descriptions and may not match the current retail SKU. Use this page as a starting point, then verify on the seller's product page before buying.

At a glance

Where they differ

• Ingredients (AI-est.): Sour cream 'n onion dip style potato chips, sour cream 'n onion — Potatoes, vegetable oil (may contain one or more of the following: cottonseed oil, palm oil, corn oil, canola oil, and/or soybean oil), maltodextrin, salt, onion powder, sour cream powder [sour cream (cream, nonfat milk, cultures), cultured nonfat milk, citric acid], garlic powder, monosodium glutam; No salt added thin & crispy potato chips — Potatoes, vegetable oil (may contain one or more of the following: cottonseed oil, palm oil, corn oil, canola oil, and/or soybean oil)..
• Carbohydrates (AI-est.): Sour cream 'n onion dip style potato chips, sour cream 'n onion — 53.6 g/100g; No salt added thin & crispy potato chips — 57.1 g/100g.
• Salt (AI-est.): Sour cream 'n onion dip style potato chips, sour cream 'n onion — 2.5 g/100g; No salt added thin & crispy potato chips — 0 g/100g.
• Sugars (AI-est.): Sour cream 'n onion dip style potato chips, sour cream 'n onion — 3.6 g/100g; No salt added thin & crispy potato chips — 0 g/100g.

Where they're similar

• Country/markets (AI-est.): both list United States.
• Protein (AI-est.): both list 7.1 g/100g.
• Energy (AI-est.): both list 571 kcal/100g.
• Saturated fat (AI-est.): both list 12.5 g/100g.
• Fat (AI-est.): both list 35.7 g/100g.

Which one for which use case

If Ingredients matters most to you, the two products list different values — see the table above and compare with your own priority. If Carbohydrates matters more, the choice may go the other way. We surface the specs; the decision is yours.

We do not rank these products against each other. This is a side-by-side of public data, not a recommendation. For purchase-specific questions (fit, warranty, regional availability, current price), consult the seller's product page or, where the product touches health, safety, or finance, consult the appropriate specialist.

Where to find them

About this comparison

This page was assembled automatically from ProductGuru's public catalog (brand, category, description, EAN/GTIN, AI-estimated attribute tags). We have not held, opened, used, or independently tested either product. Specifications labelled (AI-est.) are extracted by an AI summariser from the manufacturer-supplied product description and may be inaccurate or out of date. Always confirm the current spec sheet with the seller before buying.

Disclaimer: AI-assembled product comparison from public data. Specifications may be inaccurate or outdated. Always verify with the seller before buying. We earn a small commission from eBay if you buy through our links; this does not affect the data or the comparison. ProductGuru indexes public information and does not offer medical, financial, or other professional advice.