Red, white & blue berries sweetened corn & oat cereal, red, white & blue berries vs Cap& n crunch cotton candy breakfast cereal — Side-by-Side | ProductGuru

This page compares Red, white & blue berries sweetened corn & oat cereal, red, white & blue berries and Cap& n crunch cotton candy breakfast cereal — two products from The Quaker Oats Company, both in the Cereal category. The comparison is assembled automatically from public catalog data (specifications, descriptions, brand metadata). We have not held, tested, or independently measured either product; specifications are AI-estimated from the public product descriptions and may not match the current retail SKU. Use this page as a starting point, then verify on the seller's product page before buying.

At a glance

Where they differ

• Energy (AI-est.): Red, white & blue berries sweetened corn & oat cereal, red, white & blue berries — 395 kcal/100g; Cap& n crunch cotton candy breakfast cereal — 394.7 kcal/100g.
• Fat (AI-est.): Red, white & blue berries sweetened corn & oat cereal, red, white & blue berries — 4 g/100g; Cap& n crunch cotton candy breakfast cereal — 3.9 g/100g.
• Salt (AI-est.): Red, white & blue berries sweetened corn & oat cereal, red, white & blue berries — 1.6 g/100g; Cap& n crunch cotton candy breakfast cereal — 1.1 g/100g.
• Ingredients (AI-est.): Red, white & blue berries sweetened corn & oat cereal, red, white & blue berries — Corn flour, sugar, oat flour, brown sugar, palm and/or coconut oil, salt, sodium citrate, natural and artificial flavor, malic acid, red 40, reduced iron, blue 1, niacinamide*, thiamine mononitrate*, bht (to preserve freshness), pyridoxine hydrochloride*, riboflavin*, folic acid*.; Cap& n crunch cotton candy breakfast cereal — Corn flour, sugar, oat flour, brown sugar, palm and/or coconut oil, natural flavor, salt, blue 1, reduced iron, red 3, niacinamide*, thiamine mononitrate*, bht (to preserve freshness), pyridoxine hydrochloride*, riboflavin*, folic acid*..

Where they're similar

• Protein (AI-est.): both list 5.3 g/100g.
• Country/markets (AI-est.): both list United States.
• Carbohydrates (AI-est.): both list 86.8 g/100g.
• Sugars (AI-est.): both list 44.7 g/100g.
• Category (AI-est.): both list Cereals and their products.

Which one for which use case

If Energy matters most to you, the two products list different values — see the table above and compare with your own priority. If Fat matters more, the choice may go the other way. We surface the specs; the decision is yours.

We do not rank these products against each other. This is a side-by-side of public data, not a recommendation. For purchase-specific questions (fit, warranty, regional availability, current price), consult the seller's product page or, where the product touches health, safety, or finance, consult the appropriate specialist.

Where to find them

About this comparison

This page was assembled automatically from ProductGuru's public catalog (brand, category, description, EAN/GTIN, AI-estimated attribute tags). We have not held, opened, used, or independently tested either product. Specifications labelled (AI-est.) are extracted by an AI summariser from the manufacturer-supplied product description and may be inaccurate or out of date. Always confirm the current spec sheet with the seller before buying.

Disclaimer: AI-assembled product comparison from public data. Specifications may be inaccurate or outdated. Always verify with the seller before buying. We earn a small commission from eBay if you buy through our links; this does not affect the data or the comparison. ProductGuru indexes public information and does not offer medical, financial, or other professional advice.