Barbecue chips vs Heluva good! buttermilk ranch flavored wavy potato chips, buttermilk ranch — Side-by-Side | ProductGuru

This page compares Barbecue chips and Heluva good! buttermilk ranch flavored wavy potato chips, buttermilk ranch — two products from UTZ Quality Foods, LLC, both in the Chips, Pretzels & Snacks category. The comparison is assembled automatically from public catalog data (specifications, descriptions, brand metadata). We have not held, tested, or independently measured either product; specifications are AI-estimated from the public product descriptions and may not match the current retail SKU. Use this page as a starting point, then verify on the seller's product page before buying.

At a glance

Where they differ

• Fat (AI-est.): Barbecue chips — 32.1 g/100g; Heluva good! buttermilk ranch flavored wavy potato chips, buttermilk ranch — 35.7 g/100g.
• Ingredients (AI-est.): Barbecue chips — Potatoes, cottonseed oil, salt, sugar, dextrose, maltodextrin, torula yeast, tomato powder, dehydrated onion, monosodium glutamate, extractives of annatto, turmeric and paprika, citric acid, natural flavor, spice extractive.; Heluva good! buttermilk ranch flavored wavy potato chips, buttermilk ranch — Potatoes, cottonseed oil, salt, buttermilk, natural flavors, maltodextrin, coconut oil, garlic powder, yeast extract, sour cream (cream, nonfat milk, cultures), dextrose*, onion powder, tomato powder, spices, cream, citric acid, cultured nonfat milk, paprika, lactic acid, sugar*, malic acid, vinegar.
• Energy (AI-est.): Barbecue chips — 535.7 kcal/100g; Heluva good! buttermilk ranch flavored wavy potato chips, buttermilk ranch — 536 kcal/100g.
• Salt (AI-est.): Barbecue chips — 2.6 g/100g; Heluva good! buttermilk ranch flavored wavy potato chips, buttermilk ranch — 2.4 g/100g.

Where they're similar

• Sugars (AI-est.): both list 3.6 g/100g.
• Category (AI-est.): both list Snacks.
• Carbohydrates (AI-est.): both list 53.6 g/100g.
• Country/markets (AI-est.): both list United States.
• Protein (AI-est.): both list 7.1 g/100g.

Which one for which use case

If Fat matters most to you, the two products list different values — see the table above and compare with your own priority. If Ingredients matters more, the choice may go the other way. We surface the specs; the decision is yours.

We do not rank these products against each other. This is a side-by-side of public data, not a recommendation. For purchase-specific questions (fit, warranty, regional availability, current price), consult the seller's product page or, where the product touches health, safety, or finance, consult the appropriate specialist.

Where to find them

About this comparison

This page was assembled automatically from ProductGuru's public catalog (brand, category, description, EAN/GTIN, AI-estimated attribute tags). We have not held, opened, used, or independently tested either product. Specifications labelled (AI-est.) are extracted by an AI summariser from the manufacturer-supplied product description and may be inaccurate or out of date. Always confirm the current spec sheet with the seller before buying.

Disclaimer: AI-assembled product comparison from public data. Specifications may be inaccurate or outdated. Always verify with the seller before buying. We earn a small commission from eBay if you buy through our links; this does not affect the data or the comparison. ProductGuru indexes public information and does not offer medical, financial, or other professional advice.